Protester injured by LAPD projectile gets $1.5-million settlement, biggest yet from 2020 unrest

profile photo
By Yosi Yahoudai
Founder and Managing Partner

A Los Angeles protester whose testicle exploded when an LAPD officer shot him with a hard-foam projectile during a street demonstration in 2020 has received a $1.5 million settlement from the city, his attorneys announced Thursday.

The payout is the largest yet to arise from lawsuits accusing the LAPD of excessive force during repeated crackdowns on protesters in the wake of George Floyd’s murder by Minneapolis police, which spurred massive demonstrations across the nation during the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic.

It is also a stark reminder of the stakes that exist for taxpayers when police agencies use so-called less-lethal weapons for crowd control — as they have repeatedly done in recent weeks to clear pro-Palestinian encampments at college campuses in California and across the nation.

The settlement resolves a civil rights lawsuit protester Benjamin Montemayor filed against the city of L.A. and the LAPD, alleging excessive force and other violations of his constitutional rights.

The city did not admit any liability as part of the settlement, according to a copy reviewed by The Times. Former LAPD Chief Michel Moore and a department Use of Force Review Board had both found that the officer who shot Montemayor had acted within policy, but the Los Angeles Police Commission ruled otherwise — finding the shooting was unjustified.

Montemayor and a friend had been standing in a Hollywood crosswalk holding a large sign calling for the LAPD to be defunded in June 2020 when officers rushed forward, video of the incident showed. A dispersal order had been given, but Montemayor said he hadn’t heard it.

The video showed an officer grab Montemayor’s friend, causing her to drop her end of the sign and move out of view. Simultaneously, another officer rushed at Montemayor as he backed away.

The officer ripped the sign from Montemayor’s hand as Montemayor then put his hands up in the air, the video showed. Another officer then shoved Montemayor backward. As Montemayor began to slowly move forward again — he said to help his friend, who had been thrown to the ground — another officer stepped forward and shot him with a 40-millimeter projectile from several feet away, the video showed.

Such weapons can cause devastating injuries, especially at close range. The round fired at Montemayor caused his testicles to immediately swell, the right one to the size of a grapefruit, his lawsuit alleged. He was rushed into emergency surgery — which involved “piecing back together portions of his testicle which had exploded,” his lawsuit said.

Montemayor’s experience was highlighted in an extensive Times story just days later, about many protesters being injured by LAPD officers using projectiles and batons. The story spurred the LAPD to launch an investigation into Montemayor’s shooting and others.

Montemayor could not be reached directly for comment Thursday. In a statement provided by his attorneys, he said there is “an ongoing need for the LAPD to answer for their malfeasant conduct against demonstrators,” and that his case was “a building block for others to continue challenging institutionalized violence.”

“This settlement shows that there are repercussions for police misconduct against the people they have sworn to protect,” he said. “If financial restitution is one of the only languages a broken system speaks, then we must make it speak in volumes until the sound is inescapable: everyday citizens’ rights are not just theoretical concepts.”

Neither the LAPD nor City Atty. Hydee Feldstein Soto responded Thursday to a request for comment on Montemayor’s settlement.

David Clay Washington, one of Montemayor’s attorneys, said the LAPD’s response to the 2020 demonstrations was “chaotic and excessive,” and “despite independent investigations and dozens of lawsuits, it remains that way today. We saw it most recently in the LAPD’s response to demonstrations at UCLA.”

Another attorney, Dan Stormer, said the LAPD “needs to end its cowardly attacks on innocent citizens” with such weapons, which he said would continue unless Mayor Karen Bass put an end to “this horrific and lawless behavior.”

The parameters under which LAPD officers are allowed to use the weapons, and the information they must track and report when they are used, have changed since 2020 because of a court injunction and the passage of a state law.

Under the changes, 40-millimeter rounds are supposed to be used only by trained officers when “absolutely necessary” against people acting violently or presenting an immediate threat to the officers or others. They are not to be aimed indiscriminately into crowds, and officers are forbidden from targeting the head, neck, face, eyes, kidneys, chest, groin or spine.

The LAPD has said its use of projectile weapons at campus protests has been extremely limited.

The Montemayor settlement follows others.

Deon Jones, a protester who was shot in the face by an LAPD projectile and was also featured in the Times’ earliest coverage of police injuries to protesters in 2020, won an $860,000 settlement from the city last year. Iz Sinistra, a protester who was shot in the head with an LAPD projectile and was also featured in the Times, won a $1.25-million settlement in 2022.

The largest case against the city over the LAPD’s actions in 2020 — a class-action lawsuit representing hundreds of protesters who allege they were injured, improperly detained and otherwise mistreated — is still pending.

Medical and legal experts have repeatedly called on police agencies in California to stop using projectile weapons at fast-moving protests and other crowd control settings. Police say the weapons are one of the only tools that officers have to keep themselves safe in volatile settings.

The weapons have been used by police at multiple college campuses in recent weeks, including USC, UCLA and UC Irvine.

More to Read

author photo
About the Author
Yosi Yahoudai is a founder and the managing partner of J&Y. His practice is comprised primarily of cases involving automobile and motorcycle accidents, but he also represents people in premises liability lawsuits, including suits alleging dangerous conditions of public property, third-party criminal conduct, and intentional torts. He also has expertise in cases involving product defects, dog bites, elder abuse, and sexual assault. He earned his Bachelor of Arts from the University of California and is admitted to practice in all California State Courts, and the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. If you have any questions about this article, you can contact Yosi by clicking here.